Less than two weeks ago President Obama stood in front of graduates from The Ohio State University and told them to reject those who warn of government tyranny.

“Unfortunately, you’ve grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems,” he said.

To young, idealistic people his words likely sounded insightful — until last week. That’s when it became officially impossible to deny that the government abuses its power for political gain.

Practically overnight people labeled conspiracy theorists by the elite were proven prescient interpreters of how big government operates when news broke last Friday that the Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative groups for special scrutiny in their tax-exempt applications. The media pile on against the administration is so ferocious Fox News could run live feeds from its competitors without losing a beat.

It should be so because the partisan treatment of hundreds of groups is stunning.

Ginny Rapini saw the IRS in action firsthand. The volunteer coordinator for the NorCal Tea Party applied for 501(c)(4) status for her group in July 2009. In the spring of 2010 the IRS asked for more information. She sent in the information immediately but didn’t hear from the IRS again until January 2012, she said. At that point the agency sent the group a list of 19 questions, including a request for the names of donors, every email the group sent and minutes of each board meeting, with the requirement that everything be returned within two weeks or the agency would consider the application void, she said. She sent the IRS 3,000 pages of information prior to the deadline – but did not include the names of donors. “I think they wanted to intimidate me, but instead they made me mad,” said Rapini.

After Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) spoke about NorCal’s problems with the IRS on the floor of the House and wrote to the agency, she got a favorable response to her application in the summer of 2012 – three years after the initial request, not unlike many other organizations treated to years of silence in between harassing questions.

What makes the IRS’s actions even worse is that top officials knew about the inappropriate questioning of conservative groups since 2011 but didn’t say anything about it to Congress. Steven Miller, the acting IRS commissioner, was fired earlier this week, and should be the first of a long line of people held accountable for the agency’s flagrant mistreatment of political opponents by one of the most powerful government agencies.

On top of the IRS scandal, the Department of Justice (DOJ) last week admitted to secretly taking records of incoming and outgoing calls on work and personal phones of Associated Press (AP) reporters, its main lines in New York, Washington and Hartford, CT., and for the AP number in the House of Representatives. It took records on more than 20 lines in total in April and May of 2012 – lines used by more than 100 journalists.

Asked by National Public Radio how many other news media phone records the DOJ had taken Attorney General Eric Holder said, “I’m not sure how many of those cases…I have actually signed off on…I take them very seriously.”

So, confidential sources are not confidential if the government wants to know who they are. Whistleblowers beware.

That all of this is happening as the IRS is in the middle of hiring potentially thousands of new employees to write and enforce ObamaCare regulations should make everyone afraid. It is also happening while the IRS is in the middle of creating a giant information center with other federal agencies called the Data Services Hub to assist with rolling out ObamaCare (http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/factsheets/ffe.html ) that will provide one stop shopping on everything but what color underwear someone is wearing for the day.

The government promises, “Protecting the privacy of individuals remains the highest priority.” But after the last week, Americans should know there is no guarantee of personal privacy with the government or impartiality in how their information is used. It should also put Americans on notice that their political party could determine the quality of their health care. Welcome to the real world, Ohio State graduates.

Marta H. Mossburg writes frequently about national affairs and about Maryland, where she lives. Write her at marta@martamossburg.com. Follow her on Twitter at @mmossburg.

This thing is NOT…I reapeat, NOT going away.  There is much more to this story and it’s going to get way uglier.  As a member of a local tea party that was subject to this IRS harassment, I can tell you, we’re not satisfied that this thing has been completely and honestly exposed, and we’re not going to rest until it is.

We have a massive piece of legislation which even today most in Congress who voted for it haven’t read, which most citizens and members of Congress don’t understand, and which is deeply unpopular with the American people.  Yet we have a Senate and a President who refuse to listen to the American people when messing with a very personal area of their lives, their health care.  If this isn’t tyranny, what is?

“I have thirty years of experience in business, creating budgets,” Rollins’ opponent said.  Some of the audience members nodded in approval, and Rollins’ throat tightened.  Even he had to admit the other candidate – and his long resume — were quite impressive.

Rollins was young. In fact, no one his age had ever been elected to city council in Clay County, Florida, a northeastern Florida town nestled among beautiful sand bottom lakes.  At 22, he would be the youngest person ever elected.  That is, if he survived this debate.  He’d never even been in a debate before, but earlier that day he did watch some old footage of Ronald Reagan in debates.  Rollins loved studying the way important people in history communicated, and he learned from the Reagan clips that he simply wanted to connect with the audience.  That’s one of the reasons he didn’t bring any note cards to the podium.  He memorized his key points, and otherwise wanted to speak from the heart.

His opponent stopped speaking, and everyone turned to look at Rollins. He knew he couldn’t match his opponent’s three decades worth of budgetary experience, so he cleared his throat and leaned into the microphone.

“Well,” he began.  “I’ve been alive for 22 years.”

When the crowd laughed, he knew he had an opening to share his vision for his city. “I have three priorities,” he said.  “To keep Keystone Heights a family friendly place, to work on low water levels in the area lakes, and to keep taxes low.”

Rollins wanted to get involved in his community ever since in tenth grade, when he spent five days at “Student Leadership University” in Washington, DC.  There, he was taught to think seriously about America’s history, faith, and the responsibilities of being a citizen. “From that point on,” he said, “I got more involved in leadership roles in student government and high school clubs and I also sought out a mentor.”  When he attended Santa Fe College, he ran for student body president by making signs, speeches, and talking to students.  But, after the votes were counted, he came up short.  “The loss taught me a lot about building the right team,” he said.

He took a year off from Santa Fe College, joined the Army National Guard, and went to South Carolina for Basic Combat training and advanced individual training. After his return to his hometown Keystone Heights – a small, historic town of 1,300 —  he began attending city council meetings to learn more about community issues.  At first the details of city governance seemed a little overwhelming.  But as he listened, he began to have ideas of his own.  “A lot of this is common sense,” he thought.  He started to bring a pad of paper so he could write his thoughts down.

During his last semester at Santa Fe, he decided to put some of those ideas into action, by running for Keystone Heights City Council.  “Many people told me to wait my turn, that I was too young,” Rollins said.  “However, I felt I could make a difference.”

His first debate went well, but he and a team of friends and family had a great deal of work to do.  They headed out into the community to get his message out to voters – all voters.  He specifically targeted people who aren’t normally prone to vote in local elections and others who normally aren’t politically involved.

“We knocked on doors, made phone calls, did a mailing, created a website, and started a Facebook group. We left no stone unturned.”  But as he went into the community, people questioned his candidacy.  “Are you even old enough to vote?” some citizens asked suspiciously.  Week after week, Rollins pressed on.

On March 3^rd 2009, Rollins was with his father in the council chamber waiting for the result to be announced. After the votes were tallied, Gavin Rollins became the youngest city councilman in Clay County history.

He won by three votes.

After the results were announced, his opponent graciously congratulated him, before Rollins immediately walked across the street to thank his volunteers.  “They got quiet as I entered the room, because they hadn’t heard the results.”  He paused for just a second, told them he had actually pulled it off, and everyone erupted into cheers. “It was so special to share that monument with the team that had made it possible,” he said, before adding, “Every vote really does count.”

Of course, this was just the beginning. Even as a councilman, people were confused over his role, sometimes mistaking him for an intern or an assistant.  However, when a property tax hike was proposed, things got serious pretty quickly.  It was a whopping 64% tax increase, which directly violated one of Rollins’ three campaign platform principles.  In Florida, cities may not increase property taxes by more than 12% without a unanimous vote of their city council.  This meant Rollins’ vote could kill the whole deal.

He’d always had a philosophical opposition to tax increases, but how would his principle play out in the real world of “give and take” politics?  All of the other city councilmen – as well as the mayor — supported the tax increase.  “The other councilmen pressured me greatly,” he said.  “They said all kinds of things to get me to change. They criticized my youth, my judgment, and told me how terrible things would be if I didn’t support it.”

“I considered both sides of the issue and asked lots of citizens what they thought. Many told me the increase would be very difficult for them.”  He admits that it was an intimidating situation, but the pressure didn’t work.  “I had to ask how this would impact the citizens… not just the government. I wasn’t elected to turn government money into my own personal allowance for pet projects.”  As an alternative, young Rollins proposed a good old fashioned belt tightening.  “I felt we could do more to reduce cost by making things more efficient.  Also, I proposed getting volunteers to do many of the projects the city claimed it needed extra revenue to fund.”

The vote was 4 to 1, and his solitary vote stopped 52% of the tax increase.

The other council members resented Rollins’ unwillingness to “go along to get along.”

“I was told I would lose re-election the following march for voting against it,” he said.  In fact, the mayor and the city council stayed true to their promise to make his city council career a short one. “They recruited a strong candidate to run against me and helped him campaign.”  However, apparently the property owners of Clay County actually appreciated Rollins’ vote, which allowed them to keep more of the money they had earned, as he was re-elected by a sixty percent margin for a 3 year term.

“But this isn’t a Gavin Rollins story,” he said.  “It’s a story of building a coalition of regular citizens who wanted to make a difference.  In fact, citizens of every age can make an impact by staying involved and offering solutions,” Rollins said.  “That’s what I am passionate about: finding ways of innovating government, engaging the community in the process, and – ultimately — empowering the people.”

Sounds a lot like common sense to us.

Bonus Interview with Gavin Rollins:

CSG: Where were you born?

Rollins:  In Penang, Malaysia to missionary parents.  We moved back to Florida when I was very young, and I have lived in Florida since except during military training.

CSG: Was it tough to balance all of your civic involvement and school?

Rollins:  Yes while on the council and running two elections in less than a year, I was also in school at the University of Florida, serving in the Florida Army National Guard and doing ROTC at UF. This schedule was challenging but when the goal is big enough the passion and commitment follow.  I’m fortunate to have a loving family and supportive friends. The team made it possible. I graduated the University of Florida with honors in 2011, was commissioned as an officer in the Army National Guard, and inducted in the University of Florida Hall of Fame.

CSG:  What have you been doing lately?

Rollins:  I worked to help a decorated war hero a man of character with his successful race for Superintendent of Schools in the county I’m from. I then went to work for him fulltime helping to innovate the school system, engage the community and empower teachers and employees. I was again recently called to active duty for training this time as a Military Intelligence officer. I am currently in training until the end of June.  I will return to Florida after training and continue to work for the Clay county School System. I will also remain involved in the community and work for strong leadership for our county’s future.

 CSG: Do you have any advice for young people who want to make a difference in their community?

Rollins: I have had the opportunity to speak on various occasions to young people I share with them three things I have learned.

1. Failure is part of the process.  Don’t fear it learn from it.

2. Build a team; this is absolutely essential to success. You can’t do it alone.

3. Today matters.  Make the most of it, and don’t wait around to make a difference.  If you have good ideas, then you have a seat at the table in the United States.  You don’t have to wait your turn to make a difference.  Do it today.

CSG: So, do you watch the popular NBC sitcom Parks and Rec in which character Leslie Knope had a rather humorous run for city council?  How did that compare to your city council run?  With whom do you most identify on that show?

I have watched the show. Many parts of it certainly remind me of small town politics. I often said after heated council meetings when emotions were intense that our city should do a reality TV show.

CSG: If people would like to connect with you, what is the best way to do so?

Rollins: They can find me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/gavin.rollins.3 and on Twitter at @gavinrollins.  Also, I’d love to connect with young conservatives who have a passion to return government to the people.  Our nation is in need of conservatives to step up and get involved. Especially to my fellow young conservatives now is our time lets lead!

“A growing number of lawmakers – 101 so far – have signed on to a resolution from Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.) demanding that the House create a 19-member select committee to look into the attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans on Sept. 11, 2012.”

“Just 28 percent of Americans rate the government in Washington favorably, the lowest percentage ever in a Pew survey and down 5 percentage points from a year ago, Pew said in a statement.”

“The poll shows that 63 percent of Americans have a favorable opinion of their local government, virtually unchanged since 2007. Fifty-seven percent have a favorable view of their state governments, up 5 percentage points from 2012.”

It’s important to note that the closer government is to the people, the more trust the people have in government.  That’s as it should be.  In fact, it’s just common sense.  And while the folks in Washington DC have no common sense, clearly people across the rest of the country do.

You can read more about the poll here.

“As I studied the arguments for and against hydraulic fracturing, or frac’ing for short (fracking if you are an opponent, so that you can use the old f and ck in a word), it struck me how much breathless fear is being used to sell us on the idea that frac’ing is somehow bad. If we only look at costs and discount b, we make benefits to zero, we tend to make bad decisions. When we look at all the “could POSSIBLY be” costs and none of the benefits, we make even worse decisions. All decisions are best made by balancing both costs and the benefits.”

Puppies do far more environmental damage and kill far more people every year than fracking.  Those are just demonstrable facts.  So why all the uproar about frac’ing?  It’s about philosophy…not facts.  Frac’ing makes the use of hydrocarbons for energy highly economical.  Even when balancing risk vs. reward, there is very little in the risk column, so advances in frac’ing technology have led to a drilling boom in this country.  That goes against the philosophy of those who desire to drive humans to other energy sources.   So they use fear to sell us on the idea that frac’ing is dangerous.

“Another reality is that our emotions are largely fed by fear. We tend to act more quickly and instinctively to fear or pain. A person holding his or her hand over a flame will move it away quickly to avoid pain, far faster than someone seeking to touch a fine leather or satin. People trying to sell us stuff know this. Not just people selling us goods and services, but ideals and values. In America, selling ideals and values is a pretty big business in itself…tens of billions of dollars per year. Although fear clearly sells, it rarely buys us something we really want to own. There is no real joy in the state of NOT burning your hand…you just avoid the pain.”

When they took their three oldest children out of school in 2006, police showed up at their house within 24 hours, only leaving after a group of supporters showed up and organized a quick protest.

But their legal troubles were just beginning. Germany began fining the family, ultimately racking up a bill of more than 7,000 Euros ($9,000).

After they fled to the United States in 2010, the Romeike family initially were granted political asylum and found a home in Tennessee. They had a sixth child. But then U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) appealed the asylum decision in 2012.